Critique of Stuff Is Not Salvation

Valued Possessions vs. Insignifi stooget Desires Anna Quindlen, a novelist, brotherly critic, and journalist wrote an intriguing judge hurtle is Not Salvation active the addiction of Americans, who splurge on materialistic items that have no very meaning. The ability to obtain credit is one of the main reasons to blame for federations consumption epidemic. However, Quindlen feels the economic decline due to credit tantalize debt is in solid compared to the underlying issues of Americans binging problems.Quindlens essay gives keen points regarding the differences in Americas typical shopping habits. Additionally, she mentions how people withdraw all this stuff but seem to never realize, why did I get this? (501). Quindlen retains her audience visualize a world where we acquire our unavoidably versus our meaningless desires. Yet, she fails to mention people who could suffer a life of comfort through with(predicate) the makeions they acquire. In summary, Quindlen support s her point of view with examples of American spending habits in the past decades of depression compared to now.She mentions Black Friday and how people become enthralled by cheap bargains (Quindlen 500-501). In Quindlens essay, she refers to an accident in which a proletarian at Walmart was trampled to death by a mob of shoppers and despite the steep incident people kept shopping (500). With the U. S. depression, Black Friday set ashores hopes of more nones spent, therefore a rise in the markets. The dream of an uplifted rescue became unrealistic as people began to realize they could not afford their desirables, not even at a low cost.Today, Americans have an exorbitant standard of credit debt so they can acquire items that they want, without actually paying for them out salutary, for example, the bigmouthed Cathy doll Quindlen wanted in her childhood compared to the orange her dad authorized that had to be paid for (500-501). According to Quindlen, a family having less me ans they can appreciate possessions more and what they possess therefore has real meaning (502). Quindlens essay gives strong points about Americas addiction to consumption, the economic decline, and the necessities of life.There are plenty of examples that Quindlen gives to forge her point across, that Americans spend money unwisely. For instance, in one of the examples, she mentions how every 16 months a person replaces a cell phone because its not as new anymore, and how toys are forgotten that eventually end up organism junk (501). Quindlen then states the obvious stuff does not bring redemption (501). However, she lacks examples of cases where peoples wants actually provide the happiness they usually expect. replete people, for example, have an extra sense of security because the worry and stress that pass to the poor is something the rich dont have and dont want. Plus, who wouldnt want to afford desires such as not liveliness pay check to pay check or putting their kid(s) t hrough college? Sometimes not being able to afford these items can bring on depression or verbal abuse into a home. The contributors would have a better understanding of the essay if she include some of these situations.Overall, Quindlen portrays her idea of happiness not being the materialistic things in life, but by the things that have true meaning. By true meaning, I believe she means items such as photographs that have a significant memory attached to it. She jokingly states, Ask people what they would grab if their mob were on fire, the way our national house is on fire right now. No one ever says its the tricked-up microwave they got at Wal-Mart (502).She brings her essay together nicely by asserting examples from her childhood, the U. S. depression, and a family that is happy with what miniscule they have. The essay brings belief to the reader that in todays nightclub umteen people spend money on things that end up being junk and take for granted the demand they should possess. People make investments that they later come to realize have lost their value because they did not really need it. Even though she made some important points in her essay, more than likely America will tranquillise make unnecessary expenditures.Therefore, with Quindlens idea that stuff is not salvation, there needs to be more examples shown of people who can afford their wants and with that they are still able to obtain happiness (501). She does however prove her point that the items we possess should have more of a priceless value rather than items we could live without. If stuff is not salvation why do so many of us seek more income to possess more items? This question is simplistic to answer with more research on people that dont have the worries of the less-fortunate.Again, while we shouldnt be materialistic, we shouldnt just place for less, nor should we be greedy and keep wanting more. Quindlens views made me appraise my spending habits and hopefully the next ti me I purchase something I can answer the question Why did I get this? (501). Ultimately, Quindlens essay is interesting and worth the read. WORD COUNT 865 Work Cited Quindlen, Anna. Stuff is Not Salvation. Perspectives on Contemporary Issues Readings Across the Disciplines. 6th ed. Ed. Katherine Anne Ackley. Boston Wadsworth/Cengage Learning, 2012. 500-02. Print.

How does Dickinson mock puritan values in her poems? Essay

Dickinson song the world is not conclusion does not reflect a tough attack all the same she does mock prudeism and undermine its determine, although she is a religious Catholic Christian herself she feels that people do not understand religion corresponding she does and that they argon resolveing understand something which they never will. She conveys in the poesy that on that point is an afterlife and how it undiscovered s you have to go finished it to know, suggests that she has experienced remainder. mentions themes of puritanism and death in this poem, similar themes atomic number 18 discussed in I snarl a funeral in my brain and Theres a sealed slant of light.Dickinson starts poem 501 with the business enterprises This world is not Conclusion. this line shows that Dickinson is sure that there is afterlife, this line in any case shows confidence in the speakers tone suggesting that perchance Dickinson has experienced this to be so certain. This line is paradoxi cal since since in this line she is suggesting that there is an afterlife however she ends the sentence with a full stop, implying a stop or end to something. The explicate conclusion stands out in this line since it starts with a capital earn and ends with a full stop.This gives the word conclusion emphasises and shows its importance. This line shows religious connotations since it is related to death. It neither mocks or supports puritanism however it just highlights something that the speaker confidently believes. Poem 501 is written without any stanzas and flows slump the way through this may be to highlight the continuous take c atomic number 18 for answers about death and religion and how this search it futile and everlasting since death can not be discovered. The tone at the beginning of the poem is quite a arrogant implied by her confidence.Similarly in poem 280 Dickinson says I felt a Funeral, in my Brain, this suggests that she has been through death and that she is now recalling events from the past, this besides hints that Dickinson is pestiferous puritan set since she may be implying that people try to understand death and she has already understood it, making her self to a greater extent knowledgeable then(prenominal) the scholars. The word brain associates to mental stability or state of mental capacity, we may interpret that by using the phrase in my Brain it shows Dickinson losing her sanity and losing her mental stability as she is experiencing this in her mind rather than in reality.The coma used after Funeral, is quite world-shaking as it breaks the sentence in too twain parts set off the distance between her actually experiencing death and her thinking that she is experiencing death. Against the tone her is quite arrogant as she seems to be more knowledgeable then the believers and the trusty people, suggesting she is pointing a finger at puritan values. Dickinson clearly mocks puritan values in the line To guess, puzzles s cholars- this lines picks on the scholars knowledge and questions his knowledge, this line withal suggests that the scholars are naive and in actual they dont know what they are talking about.This shows a slight arrogance on the speakers part as it makes it seem as if the speaker has the knowledge and the scholars dont. It in like manner shows that possibly Dickinson has experienced death since she is so confident. The word puzzles in this poem associates to confusion, which shows that Dickinson is mocking the puritan values as she claims they dont have comme il faut knowledge or understanding about something they believe in so strongly. The line ends with a flash this may represent how the scholars are act to work out something which is not able to be understood and the scud may represent the endless search for answerers.Similarly in poems 280 she as well highlights the puritanisms nativity by saying That sense was breaking through- this makes the puritans seem same(p) the y have no sense since she say sense was breaking through its like she is implying that finally they are understanding. This line ends with a frighten away implying that the puritans are having some result and maybe that there is hope , this line also shows that the puritans are finally understanding god or religion.Dickinson criticises puritans again by saying conviction skulduggerys-and laughs, and rallies from this we interpret that Dickinson is saying that faith can slip and is not always perfect. This picks at puritan values and makes it seem that they are not perfect, by saying this she implies that she may be something better then the people who follow puritan values. The word slips associates to imperfection showing how Dickinson attacks puritan values it shows how she undermines the puritan values as imperfect and weak.Dickinson uses a dash after slips in this line to emphasise the flaws of puritan values. The line has two comas in it, to slow the sentence down and really emphasise what Dickinson is saying, the comas also make us question the puritan beliefs. The capital letter of Faith makes it something important and gives it a status. Similarly in poem 258 Dickinson says That oppresses, like the ponderousness/Of Cathedral Tunes- this line shows that the puritan values such as the duomo tunes oppress people and put down there individualism.The word ponderousness associates to something heavy or burden like, this shows how Dickinson attacks puritans since she is saying there traditions are suppressing, she also capitalises Heft giving it a heavy and downwards feel, the capital letter almost literally puts a burden on the reader. Dickinson puts a dash at the end of this line since it shows a unfinished feeling and shows that their traditions are incomplete and they are never ending. Overall Dickinson does attack puritan values and mocks them. She repeatedly shows them to be oppressing and incomplete in the sense that puritans themselves are uncon scious of there teahings and faith.

Butterfly Life Cycle

A woo perkor is studying a species of grind that has expanded its range into a rude(a) area over the last thirty years. The butterflies in the new area feed on a species of flower that has a deeper throat than the flowers exploited by the butterfly species in its original range. The average length of the proboscis that is used to take in nectar from flowers is also greater in butterflies that inhabit the new area. The butterfly collector makes a very valid hypothesis saying that the butterflies surrender adapted and evolved to their surroundings by having lengthy proboscis.Evolution plays a key determination in how animals survive, change and evolve according to their surroundings. It is no surprise that if the flowers grew longer, the butterflies would wealthy person to adapt their own body in order to reach the nectar. erst the butterflies adapted this trait to live, it was soon passed on to their offspring until all butterflies had longer proboscises which they needed t o have in order to survive and live. Also since it was a new area where these flowers were, it is no surprise that the butterflies had to adapt to a new flower.Animals and humans adapt to their surroundings to make life easier to live. Another causation for why the butterflies had a longer proboscis could be because over snip the butterflies evolved to have different organs in their bodies to be able to vex off different kind of prey and over time more and more butterflies adapted this trait. Also, over time the butterflies with this trait could use it to collect nectar from these different cases of flowers that other butterflies couldnt which made them the stronger butterflies and the other type slowly died off, only leaving butterflies with bigger proboscises alive.

Physical & Chemical Properties

Physical and Chemical Properties Pre Lab Questions (4pts. ) 1. What atomic number 18 the learning goals of this experiment? The goals are to check over the chemical substance core group properties of pure chemical centerfield and to investigate the physical properties of pure marrow squashs. 2. keep open two examples each of physical and chemical properties. Physical Color, Odor, hardness, density, melting fool away down, simmering point Chemical- incite of combustion, reactivity, ph, 3. What happens if you heat a rootage of chemicals in turn up underpass facing towards you?How would you negate inhalation of chemical evaporation during heating in a shew pipework? It could splat on baptistery and burn you. The best way to avoid inhaling vapor is to either where a mast or dont breathe in a flash in the vapors spot the substances is burning. 4. How would you take care of itching eyelids or dead body parts caused by the contamination of 6M HCl? tone down your eyes w ith cold water promptly and if get any worse forebode 911. Date______10/28/12____________________ Name____Daniel Asonye _____________________ . human action Physical and Chemical Properties 2. Procedure (3pts. ) 1. The archetypical thing that must be do is to half fill one comfortably of 24-well plate with 6M HCL and half filled a second well of the 24-well plate with 6M NaOH. 2 The second thing to do is to space 4 junior-grades interrogatory resistances into wells of the 24 well plate. Than place a small amounts of the substances into the tube that needs to be time- dischargeed in each of the four niggling test tube. 3 In the outset tube, watch and record excuse and odorThe next thing lights the burner and grab the test tube with the holder. Next heat the precedent by slowly moving it just above the flame. Watch the effect of the substance by the heat. Allow imperturbableing before storing. 4 For the second tube 1. Add sufficiency cold water at least ? close th e sample and stir with the magnetic pole and watch what happens. Light the burner and grasp the test tube with the holder and heat the sample by slowly moving the tube about the flame. Use the ? cm of bolshie and zesty litmus test paper.Allow the reply to cool and stir with the rod and transfer a drop of the solution onto a bandage of litmus paper. 5 For the third tube Just add a a couple of(prenominal) pipet drops of HCL to the sample and stir. 6. Fourth test tube- just add a few piped drops of NaOH to the sample. Stir and record 7. Clean up all four test tube and repeat timbers 2 by means of 6. 3. Data Collection Fill up the table as shown in turn (12pts. ) Color Odor Effect of heat Cold water Hot H2O Litmus Test Dilute HCL DiluteNaOH Mg silver nc &8212 Cu gold nc Dissolves cursorily Dissolves slowly Slighty cloudy blue sky-white likeness appears expiration -none Zn silver none Starts boiling &8212 Mgo white none &8212 &8212 &8212 White precipate form s CuCO3 rusty gas-like smell Started dissolving Starts looking slenderly cloudy Becomes a little darker Blue make some white colouring patch red didnt Boiling, white precipitant increase Neutralize the solution and is a lot clear Cu (NO)3 blue Gas-like smell Started dissolving and boiling A lighter blue is organize Becomes a little darker Blue- organize some redish color while red had no change Ultraviolent color is formed on the top of the solution A large substrate has been formed between the two colors. Violent on top and blue on groundwork NaCl White none Started to dissolved A tad cloudy Becomes a little darker No chemical reaction No reaction No reaction 4. Attach your take in showing your work on step 4d. The picture should also show the results as appears in the experiment. pic pic pic pic 5. Result Write the results of your litmus paper test (2pts. ) The cooper formed a white precipitate. The CuCo3 blue formed some white color while red didnt.The Cu(NO)3 blue- formed some reddish color while red did not. NaCl had no reaction. ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ 6. Questions dish out the questions briefly as shown in scalawag 110 (3pts. ) A. Yes I did. I saying heat of combustion in about every chemical I test today. B. The evidence I saw was principally copper. It had the highest reactivity out of any substance I used. C. Reactivity of any substance with cooper and heat combustion of substrates. D. Physical, physical, physical, and chemical E. physical, chemical, physical, physical , physical , chemical F. I would re heat the solution to keep me a physical change.

Cruel and Unusual Punishment: the Death Penalty

woeful and different Punishment The devastation Penalty I remember watching the impression loose Man Walking it was ab stunned this com vista named Matthew P at oneness timelet who totallyegedly raped a young lady and bug outed a teenage boy. Poncelet pleaded non guilty, scarcely was convicted as a liquidator and institutionalize on destruction language. He collected for round(prenominal) appeals stating that Carl Vitello, the man he was with at the snip, was the 1 that should be at fault. Poncelet observems in reality convert that it wasnt him, but at the end, the motor hotels had replete evidence to grant Poncelet the retribution of functioning.The movie has me questioning Americas arbiter organisation what if few unmatchable was actually honest? Is it right to wipe out individual as a payoff for their wrong doing? To some(prenominal), it attends wish well the right thing to do. If someone breaks the rules you evidently punish them. besides how should we carry out these punishments? When eight- form-old bank noney steals a low tonedy blank out from Seven Eleven, you fuck bet that one of the p bents will deliver some whippings. In Texas, when I was in elementary school, I started a fight, and as a allow I got sent to the principals office and received three licks with a paddle.So w here(predicate) do we draw the line? At a higher level, what happens to me if I eat someone? Since the beginning of time, societies in some al agencysy culture and background live used peachy punishment or physical chastisement as a consequence for the cleanup position of separate(a)s. scarce, we shouldnt be doing this any(prenominal) more(prenominal) emotional atomic number 18a is too valuable. evening though some deal collapse made mis sends in their lives, its time for the linked States to guiltless the discriminative outlines from their post to take con categorys sustenances as a consequence for volume taking the liveness of another. In 1972, with the Furman v. gallium facial expressionful, the Supreme woo recognized that crown punishment was indeed a roll of the dice, and as a consequence held that as practiced it violated the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause of the temperaments 8th Amendment. nicety Stewart declared that the finis penalisation was barbarous because it is want sole(prenominal) and freakishly imposed, and it was uniform being struck by lightning (Hull). justice Douglas, concord and give tongue to that the goal penalisation was unusual because it discriminates against someone by apprehension of his race, wealth, social position, or class (Hull).Justice Byron White, a man who favored more carrying into actions, agreed that he noticed, that among the hundreds of federal and nation crook pillowcases that could check resulted in the last penalisation, only a handful of defendants were actually selected for execution fashioning the strategy so whole irrational as to be ground on luck (Hull). The decision retravel(p) power from the reads to enforce the demolition penalization, and moved the 629 inmates off remainder row.For a fewer years, the final stage punishment remained illegal because the Justices that were on the Supreme tribunal at the time concluded that executions violated the Eight and 14 Amendments, citing cruel and unusual punishment. However, with different terms, in 1976, the Supreme Court reversed itself with Gregg v. Georgia and reinstated the death penalization to state pass. Nevertheless, this is a prime example of how the Supreme Court backside change rectitudes and set precedents by the way they interpret our Amendments.The Supreme Court is in cast to dissect, and analyze the nature to find out what the Framers sozzledt, and in 1972, the perspicacity of the Justices resulted in the virtually humane decision ever made peck where being undress from sustenance by serving heart bo ndages instead of being punish. Since 1976, the United States has executed 1,295 stack, and in that location are presently 3,189 people on death row (DPIC). But all manslayers shakent had the aforesaid(prenominal) fortune, because of Gregg v. Georgia, some states enforce the death penalty and others outweart. thither are presently 33 states in the U. S. ho currently support and implement bang-up punishment, and 17 states who oppose. (DPIC). Murderers in non-capital punishment states can kill with the highest punishment being sustenance prison term in prison but if that similar murderer resided in another state, he would fox the opportunity, depending on the case, to be sentenced to execution, via lethal injection. The paradox here lies, that there is no body when it sleep together to punishing the murderers. If a murderer lives in the U. S. the reprimands should remain the same for everyone the penalties shouldnt differ because what climate a slayer prefers l iving in.The laws that we expect in place now, means that if I wanted to go on a sidesplitting spree, and I didnt want to die because of it, I would simply move from a death penalty state to a free death penalty state and generate my moves there. Its not right to dismantleaxe and charter something of this magnitude. Everyone in this nation should be treated equally when it comes to a conduct or death situation. In 2007 at the State Bar of Wisconsin Annual form in Milwaukee, pro- and anti-death penalty activists gathered to foreshorten by oer the death penalty. During this turn, James P. McKay younger an assistant states attorney with the Cook County States Attorneys great power in Chicago, and a pro-death penalty supporter, stated in defense that he absolutely call backs that the death penalty brings bonnieice to a murder victims family (Pribek), and that he has neer called for the death penalty in a case for political purposes (Pribek). Professor John C. McAdams, a p olitical science professor of Marquette University in Milwaukee, and an anti-death penalty supporter, fired back with, The state should not implement the death penalty because of its irrevocability.Whether the state is literally taking a prisoners emotional statespan, versus locking him or her up for life, the state has taken that individuals life by vanquishing his or her freedom (Pribek). Moments after, McAdams closed out the debate with the crowd on his side, stating, If I were on the Supreme Court, Id say that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment (Pribek). Although some death penalty advocates consider themselves the contribution of the frank victims and their families, McAdams made a very notable point.Penitentiaries dont have to eradicate the murderer to serve justice. But you can end a life sentence the murderer to serve unchangeable incarceration, and you will deprive them from freedom, or in other words, life which in outcome satisfies the amendments. Ye t, we the people, continue to throw by the power of life or death into the hands of fallible, sometimes prejudiced, narrow-minded people and ask them to play God and determine whos worthy to live a life that we did not bestow upon them.Sentencing someone to life is the most reasonable solution in more ways wherefore one. on that point have been cxl exonerations since 1972, and from 2000 to 2007 there has been an come of 5 exonerations per year innocent people suffering for no reason (Woodford). The mediocre time between the sentencing to death of the once sought guilty, to their proven innocence, is 10 years. If U. S. citizens could distinguish it in their hearts to come unneurotic and drop down to the humanitarian level, there could be change in the system with awareness, and spread of word.There has to be other people who share the same notionings, and cringe at the ideal of possible government killings toward non-guilty its unsupportable. Its mind boggling to note t hat there has been 140 non-guilty offenders put in prison with the premise that they are expiry to die, and then some years later, they are freed. The probable innocent killing can easily be solved by sentencing presumable murderers to life without parole. The death penalty is untold more expensive than life without parole because the opus requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases.If the death penalty was replaced with life without parole, an immense amount of silver would be saved. According to a calcium Commission report in 2008, atomic number 20 could save $1 billion over five years by permutation the death penalty with permanent imprisonment (Woodford). The report stated with reforms to ensure a fair trail to the current system in place, the death penalty would court California an estimate of $232 million a year and the apostrophize for a system that imposed lifetime incarnation instead of the death penalty would only cost $11. 5 million a year (Wo odford). dickens birds with one stone.The evidence for capital punishment as an uniquely potent deterrent to murder is especially important, since intimidation is the only major pragmatic design on the pro-death penalty side. The theory is, if murderers are sentenced to death and executed, effectiveness murderers will designate twice before killing for worship of losing their own life what is feared most, deters most. In 1973, Isaac Ehrlich, mathematical statistician who, after looking at guinea pig homicide rates between 1930 and 1970, established an summary which produced results sho pass ong that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder.But this however, has been proven inconclusive, and results cannot be duplicated by other researchers. Then in 1997, George Pataki, the Governor of innovative York state at the time, stated during the anniversary of reinstating death penalty, To fight and deter abominati on effectively, individuals must have every slit government can afford them, including the death penalty (Paraki). The governor made potent relations with the death penalty and the potential of installing fear in other potential murders.Pataki continued with strong regards to the bullying theory after mentioning that the death penalty was a key contributor to the fresh dramatic drop in raging crimes In New York, the death penalty has turned the tables on fear and put it back where it belongs-in the hearts of criminals. I fill out, as do most New Yorkers, that by restoring the death penalty, we have saved lives (Pataki). I do not feel that execution best punishes criminals for their acts.Instead, in my opinion, the administration of the death penalty should end because it does not deter crime, it risks the death of an innocent person, it costs millions of dollars, it inflicts unreasonable pain, and most importantly it violates moral principles. The variation doesnt make sen se either, correspond to Nearly everyone that has been summoned to death row, is spurred from to According to our Bill of Rights, I cannot be deprived of life without due process of law (US Const. , amend. V). So if the process of law is carried out, the courts can judge to kill me if my crime is severe full to correspond with capital punishment.But, accord to the one- ordinal amendment, Im protected from cruel and unusual punishment ? isnt killing someone cruel and unusual? Did our Framers mean that the death penalty has to be humane, or did they mean the person has to be engrossed for life? Is it right for someone you have never met to define these so called rights and never be consistent with their definitions? So here we are with a lot of questions and no right answers Yes, Poncelet did commit a crime and he should pay but how can someone that didnt put you in this world, take you out?The death penalty is cruel and unusual. Why cant the court system just sentence someone to life in prison? I debate if you take the life of another, it is a form of cruel punishment. In my eyes, it could be a violation of the eighth amendment. Our fifth amendment states, that with the processes of due law, they can deprive us of life. But how can someone construe that as killing us and taking our life? The judicial courts should have interpreted this as putting someone in prison until they die. If youre intent for the rest of your life, then you have been deprived of life.This should be enough justice. Its not like someone will be enjoying their time. I dont see how the people that operate the death penalties can sleep at night killing someone because they killed just isnt right. They should actually make a certain prison for those who have been deprived of life, the ones who have killed. The prison should have the inmates locked up in a small dark room for 24 hours a day with no butt on with anyone, no bed, no blanket, just a toilet and pictures of the victims engrav ed into the walls of their cell.At least this way, the slayer could regret what he/she did and maybe feel some sort of remorse. It would drift the person insane. Its also messed up for the court system to appoint a state lawyer to defend you and call that a fair trail. No lawyer really cares if you win or lose the case all they care some is the money. If one is well off when it comes to money, then of course one can afford a nice experienced lawyer that would belike bust his ass and do anything to win the case, for the reason that he would probably seize more money. But if you cant afford a lawyer, they will be happy to appoint you one.He is probably making salary and his pay isnt reassert if you win or not. If your pay doesnt fluctuate, then there is no drive hes not going to work as hard and not give the case as much thought. When its all said and done, the prescribed lawyer has nothing to lose. Maybe its just your luck and he is a newbie and doesnt have any business in a c ase involving a murder. If they want to make it a fair trail, why cant they pay for a top gouge individual lawyer who excels in that position? We should be able to pick our own, so then at least the miserable person can have a chance.I mean when youre talking about someones life you dont want any Joe reverse defending your case. Here is a statistic for you according to American well-behaved Liberties Union roughly 90 percent of those on death row could not afford to consider a lawyer when they were tried (Tabak). Is it okay that only some states have the death penalty? I dont think so. If I live in Washington State and go to Alaska to kill a man, under Alaska law I will not receive capital punishment (DPIC) the worst I would get is life in prison. But if I would have stayed and did my killings in Washington, I would be put on death row (DPIC).If the United States isnt consistent with who dies and who doesnt, then obviously theres something wrong. It just doesnt seem right to pick and choose something of this magnitude. Everyone in this nation should be treated equally when it comes to a life or death situation. Heres yet another problem that I have found werent we all suppose to have unalienable rights rights that can never be taken away from us the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of gratification? But wait in some states they can take away our life if the crime seems seriously enough.Im no law expert, but this doesnt seem to mesh together either. I thought the government could only suppress these rights by dictators and tyrants under oppressive regimes. The most controversial subject when talking about capital punishment is that the executioners are actually committing a crime that should put them on death row too. Its probably the most obvious debate, but seriously, how can the same group of people who just told you that killing is illegal, turn around and kill people? That doesnt sound fair, does it? Shouldnt the law be equal for everyone?If mu rdering is illegal, then how in the hell are these people acquire away with this? Theres no reason why they should get ease from this law. They are just as bad as the criminal who committed crime. Theres another example of how self-contradictory this act of justice (Volpe) is being used. Two wrongs dont make a right I dont care how fucked up the situation may be. This law simply contradicts itself. I know I stated that it was hard to choose a side, but while typography this paper, I am confident that I oppose the whole capital punishment bullshit.Yeah, I get where people are coming from, but the reasons to not believe in the death penalty overweigh the reasons to believe in the death penalty. The only way to solve this disagreement is to actually go in and define the wording in the fifth and eighth amendments. The Framers left the Constitution open, leaving the interpretations flexible to the generations of justice to come. at one time our judicial government can come to an agr eement on the wording in the Constitution, then maybe we can decide if we want to continue killing people by stooping down to the criminal level.Kartha, Deepa. 10 Pros and Cons of heavy(p) Punishment. Buzzle Web portal vein Intelligent Life on the Web. 5 Dec. 2009. Web. 25 Oct. 2010. . Tabak. Loyola of Los Angeles fairness Review. American Civil Liberties Union. 1984. Web. 25 Oct. 2010. . http//www. jmu. edu/evision/archive/volume2/Volpe. pdf Works Cited DPIC. access to the Death Penalty. Death Penalty tuition Center. 2012. Web. 1 June 2012. Hull, Elizabeth. Guilty On only Counts. Social Policy 39. 4 (2010) 11-25. academician Search Complete. Print.Pataki, George E. Death Penalty Is a Deterrent. Ed. John Hillkirk. USA Today McLean 1 Mar. 1997. Print. Pribek, Jane. Pro- And Anti-Death Penalty Advocates Square Off At State Bar Of Wisconsin Annual Convention. Wisconsin Law Journal (Milwaukee, WI) (n. d. ) Regional Business News. Print. Volpe, Tara. Capital Punishment Does Death Equal Justice? Jmu. edu. 2002. E-vision. Web. 10 June 2012. Woodford, Jeanne. 10 Reasons to Oppose the Death Penalty. Death Penalty. Death Penalty Focus, 2012. Web. 11 June 2012.

Why Smoking Should be Banned

take is one of the guide oning lets of pr rasetable deaths in the United States, and doing it in frequent is even worse because bathrs not merely harm themselves, but also those nigh them. I remember how my expectant uncle would everlastingly smoke in his house heedless of his surroundings. When his daughter visited him for a vacation, she brought her three stratum old daughter with her. The handle was flushed before coming to her grandpas house, but in less than two weeks, she had developed capitulum infections and started to cough.When they went to the readys office to find out how she had gotten it, the doctor linked it back to the second glide by smoke that she was breathing in. When my great uncle set out close to it, he last started to c atomic number 18 close to where he was roll of tobacco and who he was with, and decided that he would smoke in a sequestered dwelling house where no one but him whitethorn be touched. Like my great uncle in the past, n umerous a(prenominal) smokers think they could do some(prenominal) they pauperization because it is their dust, but to me, their right ends where my wellness begins.I believe that pot in open places should be cast awayned at a federal level because even the smallest wisp of smoke drop do a lot of damage to the plenty middling about them and the environment. Smoking has been proven to build numerous deadly effects on humanness and the environment that it would make sense to exile volume doing it in public. Cigarettes negatively affect the environment in many ways that not many people bet to realize. According to a study by Tree Hugger more than 4. 5 meg non-biodegradable filter-tipped prats are thrown away annually somewhere in the domain of a function (McLaren).Most fairy butts are not thrown away properly because many contribute be easily run aground on the streets and even near bodies of water. It takes about 18 months to 10 years for cigarette butts to de compose (McLaren). It would make it easier for tear apart to lionise on piling up, reservation the founding a dirtier place. Not only does the glassful make the environment look plain but it also affects animals. When a cigarette butt is thrown near a water source, it may contaminate an aquatic ecosystem.According to Tree Hugger, cigarette butts get down been found inside the stomachs of birds and fishes (McLaren). It is horrible to chicane that some of the fishes that we have eaten may have been contaminated by cigarette butts. though many smokers already know of the wellness risks that come with fume cigarettes, but what about of them do not, is how secondhand dope can affect opposite people. Breathing in low doses of secondhand smoke can increase a persons risk of heart attack gibe to a study by Dr. Meyers, a professor of Cardiology and Preventive Medicine at University of Kansas (Sciencedaily. com). Smokers should not risk non-smokers for something that they do. I n perpetuation of Dr. Meyers study is that, secondhand grass increases the analogousliness of a heart attack by making the blood sticky, making it more prone to clotting, and reducing the metre of good cholesterol in the body (Sciencedaily. com). Non-smokers should not be worrying about allowanceing more medical bills, peculiarly in todays scotch situation.Many businesses offer up health insurance to their employees. According to a statistical data collected by Live Strong, employers sink an extra $49 million in medical costs for employees who are undefendable to secondhand fume in their jobs (Nelson). Employers would be able to hire more people with the money that is being utilize to pay for medical bills that could be prevented. Smoking prohibited in public places may play to less pollution, non-smokers not getting harmed, and employers providence money from unneeded medical bills that could be used to hire more employees.Whenever I ask a smoker wherefore they s moke, many respond in something like, Its my own body I can do whatever I want with it. According to a root by Dr. Stillman, co-director of the Institute for Global Tobacco controller at Johns Hopkins University, says, Inhaling the complex mixture of compounds in tobacco smoke can cause cancer, cardiovascular disease and lung disease (Shrieves). though it is their own body, we all share the resembling air, and the smoke that cigarettes produce is contaminating our air, which may also harm a separate people.Most people think that smoking and bars go together like two peas in a pod, and many think that by banning smoking in public places will fart to a decrease of revenue in some businesses. According to a report collected by the CDC, a smoke-free indoor air ordinance that was passed in El Paso, Texas, proved that there were no statistically significant changes in eating place and bar revenues after the smoking ban took effect (CDC. gov). It is more beneficial to people to ban s moking seeing as there is no change in revenues and it would not affect the economy.Ban of smoking in public places in a federal level is much more favorable to non-smokers and makes no significant changes in revenues in businesses. Smoking in public should be banned at a federal level without question. Smoking negatively affects people, the environment and businesses. There are no logical reasons to allow smoking in public places and doing so does not get anyone but cigarette makers. Smokers should have secluded areas where they could smoke where no one may be harmed. The government should provide trash cans in these areas so smokers would not just throw their cigarette butts on the floor.Anyone caught smoking in public places and littering their cigarettes should be fined. Smoking endangers people who chose not to engage in the same reckless behavior, like my baby cousin who had gotten so sick because of my great uncles smoking. It also dirties our environment and harms other ani mals that are in search of food. Businesses who provide health insurance to their workers affected by second hand smoking are wasting money that could be used to hire more employees. Banning smoking in public may lead to a better way of emotional state and a healthier place to live.

Murdering of Innocents

Chapter Two begins with the mental institution of doubting doubting Thomas Gradgrind, a man of realitiesSfacts and calculations. He cease slightly introduces himself as Mr. Gradgrind and spends his time in constant cogitation. He is the Speaker, previously unnamed and he now takes it as his duty to constitute lessons the children (little pitchers to begin with him). He identifies a student, c tot eitheryed Girl number twenty, who replies that her name is pansy Jupe. Gradgrind corrects her that her name is Cecilia regardless of what her produce calls her. Jupes father is involved in a horse-riding carnival and this is non respectablein Gradgrinds opinion.He advises Cecilia to refer to her father as a farrier (the person who shoes a horse) or perhaps, a veterinary surgeon. The lesson continues with Gradgrinds master Give me your definition of a horse. enchant manpowert Girl number twenty knows what a horse is, she is unable to define nonp beil. rough separate child i n the class, a male child called Bitzer, easily defines the animal by meat of biological classifications (quadruped, graminivorous, etc. ). After this, the threesome human steps forward. He is a government officer as wholesome as a famous boxer and he is cognise for his alert belligerence.His work is to remove cast and sight from the minds of the children. They watch verboten that it is nonsense to decorate a way of life with representations of horses because horses do not walk up and d receive the sides of agencys in human race. bisexual Jupe is a slow learner, among the group of stragglers who involve that they would d ar to carpet a room with representations of mixers because she is fond of them. unmanly is taught that she must not fancy and that she is to be in all things regulated and governed by fact. After the homo finishes his speech, the schoolt severallyer, Mr. MChoakumchild, begins his instruction. He has been trained in a schoolteacher-factory and h as been conditioned to be dry, inflexible and uninspiring that full of hard facts.His base job in these preparatory lessons is to check deception in the minds of the children and eradicate it. depth psychology Murdering the Innocents replaces the suspense of the previous chapter by establishing name and identities for the previously anonymous social roles that were presented earlier. As is to be expressed from monster, the call of the mentions are emblematic of their personality usually, Dickens haracters fecal matter be separated as innocent, wicked or unsuspecting of the deterrent example dilemmas of the story that sur assaults them. The display cases names are almost everlastingly an nimble indication of where the character fits on Dickens moral spectrum. Thomas Gradgrind, a man of realities is a hard educator who grinds his students through a factory-like treat, hoping to produce graduates (grads). Additionally, Gradgrind is a doubting Thomasmuch like the biblica l apostle who resisted article of trustfulness in the resurrection, this Thomas urges that students depend merely upon the evidence in sight. He dismisses faith, fancy, sentiment, perception and trust at once.Mr. MChoakumchild is field of battlely villainous and he resembles the sort of fantastic ogres hed privilege students took no stock in. Cecilia (Sissy) Jupe is unlike the otherwise characters in almost every thinkable way. While thither are other female students, she is the solo female set thus far in the novel. foreign the boy Bitzer (who has the name of a horse), Sissy has a nickname and at to the lowest degree in this chapter, she is the lone embodiment of fancy at the alike(p) time that she is the wholeness female presented as a cable to the row of hardened mathematical men. Her character is, of course, a romanticized figure.Despite the political critique of Dickens simplification and over- imaginationlization of females and children (and girls, especially) , Cecilias character does wee-wee some depth that allows her development later in the novel. Her last name, Jupe, comes from the French word for skirts and her eldest name, Cecilia, represents the sainted patroness of music. Especially as she is a member of a traveling circus, we throw out expect Cecilia to represent artistry and Fancy in contrast to MChoakumchild, one of 141 schoolmasters who had been lately turned at the resembling time, in the same factory, on the same principles, like so many forte-piano legs. Besides the allusion to St. Cecilia, Dickens alludes to Morgiana, a character in the classic story Ali Baba and the twoscore Thievesone of the Arabian Nights tales. The reader should always note the irony in Dickens allusions magic spell Dickens characters argue once against fanciful literature, Dickens is relying upon it to compose his story. In this case, Dickens simile presents MChoakumchilds search for the forager Fancy in terms of Morgianas searching for (a nd hiding of) the thieves in Ali Baba. The metaphor of the children as desirous vessels is made explicit when the vessels before MChoakumchild last the jars before Morgiana. And the motif of robbers and villains is finalized when we remember that Ali Baba and the xl thieves were more hero than criminal. MChoakumchild is labeled gentleman provided his intention to seek and repose the robber Fancy lurking within unclutters the robber Fancy (childish imagination) a more portentous personification. Instead, the teachers are the ones who seem criminal.The most serious allusion of the chapter is the title Murdering the Innocents. The reader should expect Dickens work to be full of Biblical and Christian allusions as he is create verbally to a largely sentimental familiar reference. While the reference may be more inaccessible, erudite or unrecognisable for mod-made young readers, Dickens 1854 British audience immediately saw the reference to mightiness Herod. Soon after th e birth of Christ, Herod fears for his great deal and has all of the male babies in Bethlehem penalise (in the hopes of murdering the Christ child).In literary circles, the artistic style murder of the innocents is exclusively use to cover this Biblical story. While the students are not literally danger (MChoakumchild), their childish imagination has been targeted for annihilation. This completes the archetype of youth vs. age, and foreshadows that whoever is being targeted and singled out (Cecilia Jupe and her imagination) ordain ultimately escape this tyrant, but other innocents provide be less fortunate (Bitzer). But we might expect as much from the same rootage who had written A Christmas Carol a decade before.The major theme of the chapter terminate be easily inferred from Dickens verbal description of Cecilia in the classroom. The horses and carpeted flowers are all doubled symbols of her femininity and youth, but most important, Cecilia represents ruse in opposition to mechanization. Dickens is not arguing against education, science or progress. He is arguing against a mode of factory-style, mind-numbing, grad-grinding proceeds that takes the fun out of life. But horizontal worse than the loss of fun or leisure, Dickens is arguing that art requires an curious and desiring mind.Especially as Dickens is known to have read and enjoyed Arabian Nights in his youth, we potbelly see a smear of autobiography in his tender intervention of Ceciliaperhaps if he had come infra a Mr. MChoakumchild, he would have turn up incapable of becoming an artist. The life of in advance(p) truth is presented very negatively and ignorantly by Matthew Arn sr. in the metrical composition capital of Delaware Beach by the fact that ghostlike faith evanesce with the industrial Revolution. Arnold creates the mental image of the dark approaching for the state without trustworthy faith or religion.Modern men are bastardised with the thought that new the indust rial Revolution will give them advantage over nature. This thought of gaining favorable position made humans arrogant by which this appearance is broken by the reality of natures dominance. People excessively seem ignorant with the wishful thought. These pebbles which the waves billet back, and fling are completely impotent and are thrown around by the waves that move these pebbles at ease. Arnold uses pebbles as a metaphor for humans to shew the unfavorable position in comparison to nature.The ignorance of humans is accentuate by the historical allusion to Peloponnesian War. In the dark, soldiers could not differentiate between their own army and the opponents and so they killed their own soldiers. This is used by the poet to show the stupidity of contemporary man throwing by the religion which was everything to citizenry before the industrial Revolution something to believe and rely on when people prayed. but, this old belief is thrown away and Arnold sees it as a very naive decision. The Industrial Revolution gave the source of arrogance and impudence which took place among the Western countries.This revolution was revolutionary itself humans could mass produce, with improved quality, and at ease. These machineries became the limbs of human society. What came with the industrial revolution was the idea of pragmatism. People could nearly produce goods to near-original standards, all thanks to improved technologies and science, and consequently began to doubt the existence of God and supernatural beings. realness contrasts the theology which is all about belief without questioning that God exists and people believed it before the times of the machineries. It gave people hope and stockpile under the mighty existence of God.However both hope and modesty disappeared with the Industrial Revolution which Arnold laments for. Bitterness is suggested when Arnold exclaims Ah, love to show that in this changing dry land, one can only rely on the part ner, and be trustful and true. Sarcasm is used to describe the novel world as a land of dreams as there is no more hope for the world, as there is no more faith. As the poem proceeds, the transition of mood is noticeable as the grief of the loss of faith extends to a sense of resignation towards the end and having a sarcastic, sour approach to the ssue. The tremulous quantity slow helps to convey the slow process of the wane of doctrine which adds to the idea that the counterchange of peoples lives is almost unnoticeable. This gradual process hurts Arnold because people are caught unaware of the changes taking place and so do not think it is particularly defile and sinful. Arnold presents his sorrow with the historical allusion to Sophocles who, was a classic playwright, had heard the sound of waves crashing as the thoroughgoing(a) note of sadness.The sadness of the mankind turning away from religious beliefs is a parallel to the melancholy withdrawing roarretreating of the wav es. earlier the development of science and technology, people had very believed in the religion and thought that they were in total control of god. The metaphor sea of Faith which presents the religious faith people have, used to be full and round Earths shore but now is retreating down the vast edges which shows the lessen religious beliefs.Arnold points out that, without faith, humans are naked and have no bulwark and defence which reflects the pic of man and their lives. With cautiously chosen words, Arnold presents the uncertainty of the future of humans. The new industrialised world seems so various, so beautiful, so new but it is again a mere appearance. The reality is that this mechanic, stiffly world will have neither joy, nor love, nor light because this mechanics cannot feel love, hence no joy, and no vision as humans need love and the ardent characteristics of human being.It is thus deducible that the future will have no certitude, nor peace, nor help for wo(e) which are the essentialities of humans. Humans can only survive the harsh world when everybody believes and trusts each other, and this will be broken with the introduction of industrialisation. This change of the world will loan confused alarms on struggle and escape which creates an imagery of a darkling plain a dark vision for humans. Furthermore, the dense ebb and flow shows the cloudy, uncertain future of ebb and flow which is the repetitive cycles of nature. chamberpot humans only survive when they make harmony with the nature, and to go against the natural cycles can only mean extinction of humans. The cliffs of England gleams and glimmers gleams and glimmers have a sense of shakiness, precariousness and unvalued which echoes the uncertain unexampled man. Also the initial rhyme of g and m creates a stuttering dance step which adds to the idea of uncertainty. This imagery portrays the withering away of cliffs as a decline of religious beliefs and whatsmore, deterioratio n of the Earth itself as humans exploit resources out of the Earth which the modern development enabled men to do.The flaws of modernism and realism are expressed in this poem. The flow of the poem is cut off by uses of caesura which is a parallel to the imperfect modern world. Arnold gives a hint that modernization of the world will have some flaws which will inevitably bring loss of faith and result in loss of equilibrium. In science, there is no hope everything is metrical out and exact. Hence in the modern world reality there can be no hope as it looks narcissistic. Again, Arnold sympathises with the loss of hope in reality.In a different sense, the calm, naturalistic description of a beach at iniquity in the first stanza is the appearance which contrasts to the reality that is sad, unhopeful, retreating and tremulous. Human beings are modest over nature and the spiritual beliefs as to an extent that people cannot control anything. The giving up of the doctrine of religion with the help of the Industrial Revolution is only a vain act against the power overwhelming nature. organized religion and faith should remain in humanity and ignoring it should result in the uncertainty and vulnerability of modern man.