Marcel Duchamp and Dada Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Marcel Duchamp and pascal - Article ExampleThe paper Marcel Duchamp and Dada discusses dada movement and Marcel Duchamp. What Duchamp hoped to accomplish artistically with ready-to-eats was to literally call into the question the clich that bag rests entirely within the eye of he who beholds it. Another ready-made of interest was a work that consisted of a bicycle wheel mounted upside down on a kitchen stool titled simply Bicycle Wheel. The very fact that such an exhibit would chair to questioning whether this qualifies as art at all. Question such as those were the primary component that covey Dadaists and it was such a Such were the questions raised by the concepts of Dadaism this was an innovative step that even today, well a century later, the same questions argon still capable of being raised. Duchamp and the Dada movement had the aspire of art being viewed from an cerebral perspective as well as a purely optic one the idea was to confront traditional ideas about the tr uth and spirit of aestheticism. Duchamp further defied the traditions of aesthetics and the nature of what qualifies as art with what may be his most famous Dadaist work ever, L.H.O.O.Q.. This takes the iconic image of Leonard Da Vincis Mona Lisa, perhaps the epitome for most people of the concept of what a work of art is, and transforms it by committing the anti-art act of graffiti upon it in the form of a drawn mustache across the La Giacondas enigmatic smile. While the immediate reaction might be that such an act is intended to handle Leonardo himself. and the Mona Lisa specifically. From a Dadaist perspective, however, L.H.O.O.Q. isnt even intended to an indictment of the work of art that it apparently slanders, but is intentional to be a larger attack against such things as how society positions art, as well as how art can exist in a society that has also produced such atrocities of the human condition. A deeper insight into what Duchamp may be saying could be society needs to be more clamorous in their acceptance of artworks that arent conventionally beautiful. To take this idea to its logical conclusion, of course, would to say that L.H.O.O.Q also asks society to front at itself more closely in determining what is beautiful and what is ugly. Dadas confrontational techniques consistently ask the smasher to look more closely as how the works of Duchamp might be appealing even if they are not conventionally compelling. Despite what contemporary society may appear to say, this question is hardly answered to satisfaction. In recent decades, the ideal of bang has shifted to include any number of unconventional concepts of beauty. Duchamp and the Dada movement asked that the intellectual element of an artwork reach as high a level of importance of visual beauty of it. One fan of art may look at the Mona Lisas beauty marred by a mustache as distasteful, but that criticism is not just acceptable to the Dadaists but vital. Art should not be judged exclusiv ely on the basis of aesthetics, but from an intellectual perspective as well that takes into love such things as the socio-political value the work of art has. What kind of comment does it make on the homo that has shaped the artist who created, as well as the opinions that viewers engage when they critique it. Judging a work of art simply through its visual merits result in a self-imposed limitation on the enjoyment and experience that is possible. Equally true would it be limiting to confuse art with beauty and beauty with art. Ponder this quote from Duchamp himself, Art may